The beginner’s guide to laser beam quality and M2 measurement
Monday, July 30, 2018
Laser theory teaches us that by design, most laser beam should have a Gaussian beam shape. The fundamental mode of the Gaussian beam (TEM00) is an ideal that most laser system designers want to achieve for three main reasons:
But in real life, nothing is perfect, and a pure Gaussian beam with a TEM00 profile and a bell-shaped curve that spreads on infinitely is, unfortunately, never achieved.
You might wonder (and many people do), how close is your real-life laser to perfection? In this guide, we will introduce you to the concept of laser beam quality measurement with the M2 parameter, which quantifies the laser beam quality, and how to measure M2 for a real laser.
The first lasers were made in the 60s, but it wasn’t until the early 90s that Anthony E. Siegman proposed a standard measurement for how close a laser beam is to this ideal Gaussian beam or, in other words, the measurement of laser beam quality.
Basically, it comes down to checking how your real beam waist and divergence compare to the ideal Gaussian beam at the same wavelength.
The beam parameter product (BPP) is one laser beam quality indicator that certain people use, and it is defined as the product of the beam’s smallest radius (the beam waist radius, w0) with the beam’s divergence half-angle (θ), measured at the far field. Units of measurement for BPP are mm-mrad:
BPP = θ w0
Ideal Gaussian beams have the smallest BPP for a given wavelength. Since we know that θideal = λ / (π w0,ideal ), the BPP for an ideal beam simplifies to BPPideal= λ / π. While it is simple to calculate, the BPP is not the best tool to compare one laser with another, because its ideal value changes with the wavelength.
What Siegman proposed is to use a dimensionless value for laser beam quality, by dividing a real laser’s BPP with the one from an ideal laser. We therefore obtain a ratio that indicates how close your laser beam is to the perfect Gaussian beam, and Siegman called this value M2 (pronounced m-squared).
M2 = π θ w0 / λ
One nice thing about M2 is that it is dimensionless (i.e. no units of measurement), which makes it simpler to compare different lasers. On the other hand, it’s a bit counter-intuitive, but lower values of M2 indicate better quality than higher values. In fact, the best possible result is M2 = 1, and as the value of M2 increases, the quality of the laser decreases.
Once the M2 factor is defined, it is possible to inject it back into the equations for generalized Gaussian beam propagation. When you know your laser’s M2 factor, these equations describe how your REAL laser beam propagates, how tightly it can be focused and how quickly it diverges.
Knowing the M2 value for your laser will allow you to know how tightly your laser beam can be focused. Focusing laser beams tightly is particularly important when you are using laser for manufacturing or imaging, because smaller beam waists mean that higher power densities can be reached, as well as better resolution.
It is also common practice in systems with fiber optics to look for lasers with an M2 close to 1 to allow for good coupling with single-mode fibers. The beam waist for a real beam is defined as:
As you can see in the equation above, laser beams with a lower value of M2 can be focused more tightly than lasers with a high M2.
Beam quality measurement will also allow you to know how your laser beam will diverge. When you know your beam’s divergence, you can predict the size of your laser beam at pretty much any point in space. The beam radius for a real beam is defined as:
And the divergence in the far field for a real laser is defined as:
In the equation above, you can see that lasers with a high M2 diverge more rapidly than lasers with a low M2. Laser manufacturers like to provide the M2 factor in their specifications because it gives the users an idea of how easy it will be to work with their laser.
Siegman’s proposal became popular because of its simplicity, but experimentally it isn’t so straightforward, and some uncertainties arise from these principles. For example, if you want to measure the waist radius in the lab, how can you be sure that your measurement device is positioned exactly at the focus?
And how far do you need to go to be in the far field to measure the divergence? Are these two data points enough? The folks at the International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, decided to put an end to all this confusion, so they wrote a norm explaining how to measure and calculate M2 properly: ISO 11146.
The ISO norm explains a method to calculate M2 from a set of beam diameter measurements, in a way that minimizes sources of error. Here are the main steps:
The ISO norm also states a few extra rules about the measurement of diameters (especially when using array sensors such as CCD or CMOS sensors):
At the most basic level, all you need is a lens, a beam profiler and a ruler. You can read our application note that explains step-by-step how to measure beam profile quality with these basic tools and calculate the laser beam quality result using our free software.
Although it is inexpensive, this method is time-consuming, so you have to wish that your laser is stable enough so that its M2 value doesn’t fluctuate while you are taking the various diameter measurements! A simple way to increase the acquisition speed is to mount the beam profiler on a motorized translation stage and automate the acquisition.
In the moving stage case, setting up your system and automation routine can take a while, so you can save a lot of time and effort, because we did it all for you already! Our Beamage-M2 automated laser beam quality measurement system goes a few steps further than what was described above and it is so easy to set up that you can start measuring M2 values in a few minutes the first time, and in less than a minute once you get it going.
Now that you know more about laser beam quality measurement, you will have a better idea of whether it is actually what you need to measure. Keep in mind that M2 is an indicator of how close your laser beam is to the ideal TEM00 Gaussian beam.
If, for example, you are trying to develop a laser with nondiffractive beams like Bessel beams, or higher-order Gaussian beams with donut profiles, then M2 is probably not a good indicator for you.
That’s it! You now understand the fundamentals of M2 measurement… Any questions? Feel free to comment below or contact us, we will be happy to answer!